2 Time and the dialogical self
نویسنده
چکیده
Although time is recognized as an important factor relating dialogical selves, space is the primary metaphor used when discussing alternative I-positions in dialogical relations (e.g. Hermans 2001, 2002; Hermans and Kempen 1993; Raggatt 2000). However, more recently, there has been a growing theoretical interest in the temporal dimension of dialogicality (e.g. Bertau and Gonçalves 2007; Bhatia and Ram 2001; Gillespie 2005, 2007; Hermans and Dimaggio 2004; Hermans and HermansKonopka 2010; McAdams 2006; Märtsin 2010; Raggatt 2010; Valsiner 2001). This interest has taken several forms. For instance, Hermans and Hermans-Konopka (2010) devote a chapter of their review of dialogical self theory (DST) on the historical development in the West in conceptions of self, from traditional, to modern, to postmodern, all of which they see as embedded in our current understanding of the self. Taking a more ontogenetic approach to the temporal dimension, Bertau and Gonçalves (2007) recently edited a volume of papers devoted to the early development of the dialogical self and the forms it takes from preverbal to early verbal development. A longer, life-historical perspective on temporal transformations in the representation of the dialogical self is found both in clinical (e.g. Hermans and Dimaggio 2004) and in non-clinical case studies (e.g. Gillespie 2005; McAdams 2006; Raggatt 2010, in press). Finally, although short-term change through time in dialogical relations has often been described, the micro-dynamics of change through time in dialogical relations and structural variations of I-positions has increasingly become theorized in a variety of models of change (e.g. Hermans and Hermans-Konopka 2010; Märtsin 2010; Valsiner 2001). In a previous paper, I presented a three-dimensional model of the dialogical self (Barresi 2002a), which added a reflective dimension and a temporal dimension to a spatial dimension of I-positions. The vertical dimension of themodel represents the individual’s degree of self-reflection,
منابع مشابه
گذر از جامعهشناسی روان به روانشناسی جامعه: پیشنهاد یک تقسیمبندی نو از انواع
The dialogical self-theory knows the human's mind as an internal society that its members (the types of self) are engaged in dialogue and dominance seeking as well as an external society. This theory has divided the "self" into three types: traditional (mythical), modern, and post-modern, and then mentioned the characteristics of each according to historical epoch linked with them. Pr...
متن کاملThe Dialogical Jung: Otherness within the Self
This paper explores dialogical currents in Jung's analytical psychology, with reference to contemporary theories of the dialogical self. The dialogical self is a notion that has gained increasing currency in psychology since the 1990s, in response to the limitations of traditional notions of the self, based on monological, encapsulated consciousness. Modern dialogical self theory construes the ...
متن کاملDialogical Self: Author and Narrator of Career Life Themes
This conceptual paper introduces the Theory of Dialogical Self to the career development literature. The life themes component of the Theory of Career Construction is the focus of application for dialogical self. It is proposed that the notion of dialogical self may contribute to understanding how individuals construct the career-related life themes. Dialogical self is thus presented as a promi...
متن کاملThe Dialogical Self: Converging East-West Constructions
Prompted by the work of Hermans, we attempt to construct the dialogical self informed by Eastern traditions. To describe dialogical phenomenology we turn to three resources: (a) ~"\ Chinese intellectual traditions, (b) dreams and (c) daily life. J Dialogical attributes are described: the dialogical self is capable of -^ polyvocality but also of achieving unity with diversity; metacognition is v...
متن کاملCulture and Identity in Anthropology: Reflections on ‘unity’ and ‘uncertainty’ in the Dialogical Self
The dialogical self is a very useful concept for the analysis of the multiple identifications of individuals in multicultural circumstances that are so characteristic of the contemporary era of globalisation. It complements the dynamic conception of culture that has emerged in anthropology in recent decades, while it has a number of advantages over the traditional concept of identity. This arti...
متن کامل